On 11 Oct 2002 at 16:39, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:04:29PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > On 11 Oct 2002 at 16:29, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:54:15PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > > I will look at it, too. Thanks for the link. In some cases, starting > > > anew is faster than learning unmaintained existing code. > > Ok. Checked out what usogres is. It is not what I want. I don't want > a static `main database'. It should simply a cluster of them - just like > a set of Raid-0 disks, may be with a tempory controller for some tasks.
Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries, application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix cluster anyway. > Also, as a matter of fact, usogres is not unmaintained code. Glad to know that. I wrote to author with some suggestion and never got a reply. Didn't bother joining mailing list though.. Regards, Shridhar ----------------------------------------------------------- Shridhar Daithankar LIMS CPE Team Member, PSPL. mailto:shridhar_daithankar@;persistent.co.in Phone:- +91-20-5678900 Extn.270 Fax :- +91-20-5678901 ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
