On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ian Barwick <i...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Howver in this particular use case, as long as it doesn't produce false > positives (I haven't looked at the patch) I don't think it would cause > any problems (of the kind which would require actively excluding certain > languages/character sets), it just wouldn't be quite as useful.
I'm not sure what you mean by false positives. The patch just shows a HINT, where before there was none. It's possible for any number of reasons that it isn't the most useful possible suggestion, since Levenshtein distance is used as opposed to any other scheme that might be better sometimes. I think that the hint given is a generally useful piece of information in the event of an ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_COLUMN error. Obviously I think the patch is worthwhile, but fundamentally the HINT given is just a guess, as with the existing HINTs. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
