Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've started playing a little with Postgres to determine if there were
> memory leaks running around. After some very brief checking, I'm
> starting[1] to think that the answer is yes. Has anyone already gone
> through a significant effort to locate and eradicate memory leaks?
Yes, this has been dealt with before. Have you read
src/backend/utils/mmgr/README?
AFAIK the major problems these days are not in the backend as a whole,
but in the lesser-used PL language modules (cf recent discussions).
plpgsql has some issues too, I suspect, but not as bad as pltcl etc.
Possibly the best answer is to integrate the memory-context notion into
those modules; if they did most of their work in a temp context that
could be freed once per PL statement or so, the problems would pretty
much go away.
It's fairly difficult to get anywhere with standard leak-tracking tools,
since they don't know anything about palloc. What's worse, it is *not*
a bug for a routine to palloc space it never pfrees, if it knows that
it's palloc'ing in a short-lived memory context. The fact that a
context may be released with much still-allocated memory in it is not a
bug but a feature; but try teaching that to any standard leak checker...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
