Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... So this whole area is a minefield, and the only
>> attractive thing we can do is to try to reduce the number of errors that
>> can get thrown post-commit. We already, for example, do not treat
>> post-commit file unlink failures as ERROR, though we surely would prefer
>> to do that.
> We could treated it as a lost-communication scenario. The appropriate
> recovery actions from the client's point of view are identical.
I'd hardly rate that as an attractive option.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
