Marc G. Fournier writes: > Okay, this is the only message(s) I have on this ... since "merging" > earthdistance back into the tree will most likely cause more headaches, > breakage and outcries, and since I see no reason why anyone would want to > 'checkout' a module that has already been checked out (instead of doing an > update like the rest of us), there is no way I'm going to put > earthdistance back in ... > > ... unless there is, in fact, a completely different problem?
It causes a useless and confusing divergence between the module names used to check out things and the names that appear in various messages, files, and the online views. Certainly it'd be a bad idea to do this now, but please do it after 7.3 is released. Just because removing a silliness causes a brief inconvenience is no reason to hang on to a silliness. > Once v7.3 is released, I'd like to see a continuation of moving the > non-core stuff over to GBorg, as well, so this will likely disappear at > that time ... The issues I point out would continue to exist. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
