On May 29, 2014 12:12 AM, "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with you that there are only few corner cases where evicting > shared buffers by this utility would harm, but was wondering if we could > even save those, say if it would only use available free buffers. I think > currently there is no such interface and inventing a new interface for this > case doesn't seem to reasonable unless we see any other use case of > such a interface.
+1