Matteo Beccati <p...@beccati.com> writes:
> On 26/05/2014 19:31, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2014-05-26 13:25:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Matteo Beccati <p...@beccati.com> writes:
>>>> * Restored --with-ossp-uuid. Configure tries ossp support first, then
>>>> falls back to Linux and BSD variants
>> Imo should be the other way round.
> My goal was to avoid changing the underlying implementation if someone
> has the ossp library installed. Tom is suggesting to split the configure
> switch in two, so I guess that would allow the most flexibility.
Yeah: if we have two configure switches then we can avoid having to decide
which library takes precedence. But the main reason for that is we have
a general policy that what you get from a given configure switch should be
predictable, rather than depending on what is or is not installed. (If we
were sure these libraries were 100% interchangeable then maybe one switch
would be OK, but I'm not too sure about that, yet.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
