Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> IMO it's better if we can write SQL in multiples line *without* a tailing
>>> escape character, like psql's input file.
>> Yeah, that would be much cleaner.
> But that would require duplicating the lexing stuff to determine where
> quotes are and where commands end. There are already some cases where
> pgbench itself is the bottleneck; adding a lexing step would be more
> expensive, no? Whereas simply detecting line continuations would be
> cheaper.
Well, we only parse the script file(s) once at run start, and that time
isn't included in the TPS timing, so I don't think performance is really
an issue here. But yeah, the amount of code that would have to be
duplicated out of psql is pretty daunting --- it'd be a maintenance
nightmare, for what seems like not a lot of gain. There would also
be a compatibility issue if we went this way, because existing scripts
that haven't bothered with semicolon line terminators would break.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
