Hi, On 2014-05-25 16:59:24 -0600, Jeff Ross wrote: > Could a check like this be added to pg_upgrade? > Is there a downside to > adding a column big enough to force a toast table and then dropping it for > any table that is too large not to have a toast table but doesn't?
It can take time and permanently 'uses up' a attribute number. So you'd add costs for everyone for the few people that decided to do something dangerous and unsupported... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
