On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I guess it depends how likely we think that a different compiler will > change the behavior of the shared invalidation queue. Somebody else > would have to answer that. If not, then clearly we need only 5 animals.
This may be heresy, but one of the things that drives me nuts about the buildfarm is that the names of the animals are all weird stuff that I've never heard of, and things on the same machine have completely unrelated names. Would it be crazy to think we might name all of these animals in some way that lets people associated them with each other? e.g. brownbear, blackbear, polarbear, grizzlybear, teddybear? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
