On 05/06/2014 04:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/06/2014 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On 2014-05-06 09:37:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Sorry, it is *way* too late for 9.4. >> >>> It's imo a regression/oversight introduced in the pg_lsn patch. Not a >>> new feature. >> >> You can argue that if you like, but it doesn't matter. It's too late >> for >> a change as big as that for such an inessential feature. We are in the >> stabilization game at this point, and adding features is not the >> thing to >> be doing. > > FWIW, I agree with Andres that this would be a reasonable thing to > add. Exactly the kind of oversight that we should be fixing at this > stage in the release cycle.
I agree as well. -- Vik -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
