On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Thomas Reiss <thomas.re...@dalibo.com> wrote:
> You can find attached a small patch to fix the pg_replication_slots
> documentation. The slot_type and plugin are not in the appropriate
> order, slot_name and plugin have a wrong type and xmin appears two times.
Without the patch, the description of catalog_xmin is:
<entry>The <literal>xmin</literal>, or oldest transaction ID, that this
slot forces to be retained in the system catalogs. </entry>
With the patch it's:
<entry>The oldest transaction that this slot needs the database to
retain. <literal>VACUUM</literal> cannot remove catalog tuples deleted
by any later transaction.
That's only one word different from the language for xmin, which
doesn't seem quite right. Committed after fixing that.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
