On 4/21/14 8:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 2014-04-21 11:45:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
That seems to make more sense. I can't imagine why this would be a runtime
parameter as opposed to build time.
Because that implies that packagers and porters need to make that
decision. If it's a GUC people can benchmark it and decide.
As against that, the packager would be more likely to get it right
(or even to know that there's an issue).
Can the package builder not set the default for the runtime tunable?
Honestly we're about to select a db platform for another FreeBSD based
system we are building, I strongly hoping that we can get back to
sysvshm easily otherwise we may have to select another store.
-Alfred (who still remembers back when Tom had a login on our primary db
to help us. :) )
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
