Tom Lane wrote: > I was wondering whether an ALTER TABLE command is really the right way > to approach this. If we had an ALTER-type command, presumably the > implication is that its effects would be global to all backends. But > the uses that I've seen for suspending trigger invocations would be > happier with a local, temporary setting that only affects the current > backend. Any thoughts about that?
I think SET would be the proper place, but I don't see how to make it table-specific. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
