> Is it worth an initdb for 7.3b3 to fix this? I think we were already > considering forcing one for the command-tag issues, otherwise I'd > probably vote "no". Comments?
Do we need an initdb to fix command tags? I thought that was just a change in the Query structure. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I must be missing something obvious here but it seems that bitfromint4 > > is not working under 7.3b2. I can still see bitfromint4 in the source > > code, utils/adt/varbit.c, but it is no longer working. Any ideas why? > > It's still there: > > regression=# select "bit"(42); > bit > ---------------------------------- > 00000000000000000000000000101010 > (1 row) > > However, it's not listed in pg_cast :-( > > regression=# select cast(42 as bit); > ERROR: Cannot cast type integer to bit > > Looking at the CVS logs, this seems to be caused by overlapping changes. > On 4-Aug Thomas renamed bittoint4 and bitfromint4 to match the more > usual naming conventions for cast functions, viz int4(bit) and > bit(int4), and he also added int8(bit) and bit(int8). This was after > Peter had trolled the catalogs for cast functions and created the > initial contents of pg_cast.h (on 18-Jul). > > Upshot: we have here four functions that ought to be in pg_cast and are > not. > > Is it worth an initdb for 7.3b3 to fix this? I think we were already > considering forcing one for the command-tag issues, otherwise I'd > probably vote "no". Comments? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster