On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:11:53AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Has anyone thought about this in the last few years? I know that Tom > examined the LRU-K paper back in 2000 [5], but was discouraged by some > kind of contention or CPU overhead (although he did say he intended to > revisit the question). Obviously a lot has changed in the past 14 > years, particularly with regard to CPU characteristics.
I am glad you are looking at this. You are right that it requires a huge amount of testing, but clearly our code needs improvement in this area. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
