On 2014-04-09 09:17:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I've tried to reproduce problems around this (when I wrote this), but > > it's really hard to construct cases that need more than 8 pins. I've > > tested performance for those cases by simply not using the array, and > > while the performance suffers a bit, it's not that bad. > > Suspended queries won't do it?
What exactly do you mean by "suspended" queries? Defined and started portals? Recursive query execution? > Also, it would be good to quantify "not that bad". The 'not bad' comes from my memory of the benchmarks I'd done after about 12h of flying around ;). Yes, it needs real benchmarks. Probably won't get to it the next few days tho. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
