On 21 March 2014 14:22, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That seems to work fairly well. On the few tests I could run on my > laptop - I've done this during a flight - it's a small performance win > in all cases I could test. While saving a fair amount of memory. We've got to the stage now that saving this much memory is essential, so this patch is a must-have. The patch does all I would expect and no more, so approach and details look good to me. Performance? Discussed many years ago, but I suspect the micro-tuning of those earlier patches wasn't as good as it is here. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
