On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > > I've attached an updated invtrans_strictstrict_base patch which has the > > feature removed. > > What is the state of play on this patch? Is the latest version what's in > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/64f96fd9-64d1-40b9-8861-e61820292...@phlo.org > plus this sub-patch? Is everybody reasonably happy with it? I don't > see it marked "ready for committer" in the CF app, but time is running > out. > > As far as I know the only concern left was around the extra stats in the explain output, which I removed in the patch I attached in the previous email. The invtrans_strictstrict_base.patch in my previous email replaces the invtrans_strictstrict_base_038070.patch in that Florian sent here http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/64F96FD9-64D1-40B9-8861-E6182029220B@phlo.orgall of the other patches are unchanged so it's save to use Florian's latest ones Perhaps Dean can confirm that there's nothing else outstanding? > regards, tom lane >
