On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Meh. I think you're putting a bit too much faith in your ability to >>> predict the locus of bugs that you think aren't there. > >> Well, I'm open to suggestions. > > As a suggestion: it'd be worth explicitly testing zero-byte and one-byte > messages, those being obvious edge cases. Then, say, randomly chosen > lengths in the range 100-1000; this would help ferret out odd-length > issues. And something with message sizes larger than the queue size.
All right, done. Let's see if that tickles any edge cases we haven't hit before. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
