On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that >>> up. >> The attached patch tighten that up. > Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat > grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT.
Meh. There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
