On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > On 03/13/2014 03:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa >> <kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> >>> (2014/03/09 1:49), Fabien COELHO wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm okay with this UI and its implementation. >>> >>> >>> OK. >> >> >> We should do the same discussion for the UI of command-line option? >> The patch adds two options --gaussian and --exponential, but this UI >> seems to be a bit inconsistent with the UI for \setrandom. Instead, >> we can use something like --distribution=[uniform | gaussian | >> exponential]. > > > IMHO we should just implement the \setrandom changes, and not add any of > these options to modify the standard test workload. If someone wants to run > TPC-B workload with gaussian or exponential distribution, they can implement > it as a custom script. The docs include the script for the standard TPC-B > workload; just copy-paster that and modify the \setrandom lines.
Yeah, I'm OK with this. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
