On 03/10/2014 12:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> On 03/10/2014 11:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this >>> issue unaddressed. It may well be something that needs improvement, >>> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a >>> commit. >> >> Wait, does this mean Changesets is committed? Or only part of it? > > The core of the feature was b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53, > but that only allowed it through the SQL interface. The new commit, > 8722017bbcbc95e311bbaa6d21cd028e296e5e35, makes it available via > walsender interface. There isn't a client for that interface yet, but > if you're wondering whether it's time to break out the champagne, I'm > thinking probably.
Yeah, that's my thoughts. Although I might wait for recvlogical. Will put documentation wordsmithing on my todo list once Andres commits. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
