On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Well, the jsonb portion of this is arguably the most ready, certainly it's > had a lot more on-list review.
That is definitely true. Also, the jsonb type does not introduce any new patterns that are not already covered by json -- it just does some things better/faster (and, in a couple of cases, a bit differently) so there's a safe harbor. The implicit casts snuck in after the review started -- that was a mistake obviously (but mostly with hstore). The side argument of 'to extension or not' is just that. Make a decision and commit this thing. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
