(2014/02/28 2:39), Tom Lane wrote: > Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: >>> Yeah, but they don't make -P take an integer argument. It's that >>> little frammish that makes this problem significant. > >> I do not see a strong case to make options with arguments case insensitive >> as a general rule. If this is done for -p/-P, why not -t/-T? I'll say the same thing. And if we remove -P short option in pgbench, it means that -P with integer will be forbided in postgres command. Surely, we don't hope so.
>> If you really fell you must remove -P, please replace it by another >> one-letter, I use this option nearly everytime a run pgbench. > > Meh. If I thought -P would be that popular, I'd expect people to get > used to the issue. I don't believe it though. At least, a user which is interested in postgres performance tuning(include kernel options, etc) will often use this option. I recommended this feature, because we can see the bottle-neck which we have not seen:) I believe you will also become to like it more and more, while you use it. Regards, -- Mitsumasa KONDO NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
