2014-02-24 02:44, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se>: > Note: The patches do not apply anymore due to changes to > src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile.
I will fix it on the next version. > I see, thanks for the explanation. But I am still not very fond of how that > code is written since I find it hard to verify the correctness of it, but > have no better suggestions. We can split the selectivity estimation patch from the GiST support, add it to the next commit fest for more review. In the mean time, I can improve it with join selectivity estimation. Testing with different datasets would help the most to reveal how true the algorithm is. > Do you think the new index is useful even if you use the basic geo_selfuncs? > Or should we wait with committing the patches until all selfuncs are > implemented? My motivation was to be able to use the cidr datatype with exclusion constraints. I think the index would also be useful without proper selectivity estimation functions. Range types also use geo_selfuncs for join selectivity estimation. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
