Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > So I'd like to confirm that this issue doesn't affect 9.1.
It doesn't. I suspect it has something to do with 173e29aa5 or one
of the nearby commits in backend/regex/.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
