On 02/04/2014 05:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so
there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after
a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not
an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the
MSVC build faster?
Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have
major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4"
on a decent linux box.
I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw. That thing makes a huge difference
in the perceived build speed ...
Indeed. But it's not really, AFAIK. Certainly it's not in the list of
packages known to mingw-get on the machine i checked on (jacana).
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
