In 9.3 I noticed that postmaster considers bgworker crashed (and
therefore tries to restart it) even if it has exited with zero status code.
I first thought about a patch like the one below, but then noticed that
postmaster.c:bgworker_quickdie() signal handler exits with 0 too (when
there's no success). Do we need my patch, my patch + <something for the
handler> or no patch at all?
// Antonin Houska (Tony)
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 0957e91..0313fd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -2791,11 +2814,7 @@ reaper(SIGNAL_ARGS)
/* Was it one of our background workers? */
if (CleanupBackgroundWorker(pid, exitstatus))
- {
- /* have it be restarted */
- HaveCrashedWorker = true;
continue;
- }
/*
* Else do standard backend child cleanup.
@@ -2851,7 +2870,10 @@ CleanupBackgroundWorker(int pid,
/* Delay restarting any bgworker that exits with a
nonzero status. */
if (!EXIT_STATUS_0(exitstatus))
+ {
rw->rw_crashed_at = GetCurrentTimestamp();
+ HaveCrashedWorker = true;
+ }
else
rw->rw_crashed_at = 0;
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
