Hi, On 2014-01-28 21:27:29 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > 1) I've added an abstracted atomic ops implementation. Needs a fair > > amount of work, also submitted as a separate CF entry. (Patch 1 & 2) > > Commit 220b34331f77effdb46798ddd7cca0cffc1b2858 caused bitrot when > applying 0002-Very-basic-atomic-ops-implementation.patch. Please > rebase.
I've pushed a rebased version of the patchset to http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/postgres.git branch rwlock contention. 220b34331f77effdb46798ddd7cca0cffc1b2858 actually was the small problem, ea9df812d8502fff74e7bc37d61bdc7d66d77a7f was the major PITA. I plan to split the atomics patch into smaller chunks before reposting. Imo the "Convert the PGPROC->lwWaitLink list into a dlist instead of open coding it." is worth being applied independently from the rest of the series, it simplies code and it fixes a bug... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
