On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:36:48PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:32:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Or this:
> > 
> > - mp_int_copy(a, b); /* ok: 0 <= r < b */
> > - mp_int_copy(&q, a); /* ok: q <= a   */
> > + mp_int_copy(a, b); /* ok:  0 <= r < b */
> > + mp_int_copy(&q, a); /* ok:  q <= a     */
> > 
> > I do agree with you some of the changes-after-periods look like
> > improvements; what I meant to say is that there is an awful lot of
> > churn in this patch that is unrelated to that particular point.
> 
> Let me work on a entab patch that does replacements in comments only
> after periods and post the results.  I should be done in an hour.

OK, eight hours later, I have the results for only removing tabs after
periods in comments:

        http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.cdiff
        http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.pdiff
        http://momjian.us/expire/entab_comment.v2.udiff

The diff line counts are:

        64356 entab_comment.v2.cdiff
        17327 entab_comment.v2.pdiff
        35453 entab_comment.v2.udiff

It represents 3903 lines changed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to