On 01/30/2014 01:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
On 01/30/2014 01:03 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On 01/30/2014 06:45 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
We'd have to move that code from hstore to jsonb_support.c and then
make hstore refer to it.
Or just copy it and leave hstore alone - the code duplication is not
terribly huge here and hstore might still want to develop independently.
We have gone to great deal of trouble to make jsonb and nested hstore
more or less incarnations of the same thing. The new hstore relies
heavily on the new jsonb. So what you're suggesting is the opposite of
what's been developed these last months.
If so, why would you be resistant to pushing more code out of hstore
and into jsonb?
I'm not. Above I suggested exactly that. I was simply opposed to Hannu's
suggestion that instead of making hstore refer to the adopted code we
maintain two copies of code that does essentially the same thing.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
