Tom Lane wrote: > Anyway, I have no great objection to the proposed patch, I'm just dubious > that it's really worth the trouble. If you do go through with it, I'd > suggest adding an installcheck-with variant. > > In the bikeshedding department, maybe "-tests" instead of "-with"?
No objection to the proposed idea either, but I wanted to point out that I had the idea sometime ago that each test would declare which other test it depended on; so if you specify one to run in isolation, the ones it depended on got run beforehand. I never got around to implementing it because running the whole bunch doesn't take that long anyway, but if for some reason you want to run a specific test over and over, it is useful. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers