On 20 January 2014 17:00, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> What if you're a superuser and you want to move everybody's objects
>> (perhaps in preparation for dropping the tablespace)?  I think there's
>> value in both the ALL and OWNED forms.
>
> A superuser is considered to 'own' all objects and so 'ALL' and 'OWNED'
> above would be the same when issued by a superuser, in the current
> implementation.
>
> Looking at DROP OWNED and REASSIGN OWNED, they operate at the more
> specific level of "OWNED" == "relowner" rather than if the role is
> considered an 'owner' of the object through role membership, as you are
> implying above.
>
> As such, I'll rework this to be more in-line with the existing OWNED BY
> semantics of REASSIGN OWNED BY and DROP OWNED BY, which means we'd have:
>
> ALTER TABLESPACE name MOVE [ ALL | OWNED [ BY reluser ] ]
>     [ TABLES | INDEXES | MATERIALIZED VIEWS ] TO name opt_nowait
>
> eg:
>
> ALTER TABLESPACE tblspc1 MOVE ALL TO tblspc2;
> ALTER TABLESPACE tblspc1 MOVE OWNED TO tblspc2;
> ALTER TABLESPACE tblspc1 MOVE OWNED BY myrole TO tblspc2;
> ALTER TABLESPACE tblspc1 MOVE TABLES OWNED BY myrole TO tblspc2;
> ALTER TABLESPACE tblspc1 MOVE ALL OWNED BY myrole TO tblspc2;

Sounds great, thanks.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to