Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On 1/15/14, 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Yes, I'm also arguing that postgresql.auto.conf should go into conf.d.
>> I said I'd bring that up again after ALTER SYSTEM SET was committed, and
>> here it is.
> Independent of the above, I don't agree with that. postgresql.auto.conf
> is a special thing and should have its own special place. For once
> thing, when putting configuration files in a separate directory
> structure (/etc/ vs /var), then postgresql.auto.conf should stay in the
> data directory.
It seems like we still aren't all on the same page as to whether the
conf.d directory (and contained files) should be expected to be writable
by the postgres server or not. I think it's hopeless to proceed further
unless there's a strong consensus on that.
My vote would be that the server should *not* be expected to be able to
write these files. It might physically be able to, in a quick-and-dirty
installation, but in a setup prepared by a packaging system I'd not
expect that the config files would be postgres-owned.
Given that assumption, it's clear that postgresql.auto.conf can't live
in conf.d. However, if you reject that assumption then maybe it should.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
