On 2014-01-13 10:56:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Well, it was the lack of sysctl options which takes the 2Q change from > "annoyance" to "potential disaster". We can't ever get away from the > possibility that the Postgres use-case might be the minority use-case, > and we might have to use non-default options. It's when those options > aren't present *at all* that we're stuck.
Unless I am missing something the kernel's going further *away* from a simple 2q system, not the contrary. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
