Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> We could certainly add a function that returns SETOF record, taking
> e.g. regclass as an argument, but it doesn't seem a stretch to me to
> think that you might want to get tuple header information for some but
> not all tuples in the relation, and I don't see any real good way to
> tell the function exactly what tuples you want except by invoking it
> once per TID.
I have no objection to having a function that retrieves the details for
a given TID alongside one that does it for a whole relation. The point
here is just that we should be headed in the direction of removing as
many system columns as we can, not adding more; especially not ones that
(a) have no purpose except forensics and (b) are virtually certain to
change across system versions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
