On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, absolutely. The first backend that needs a prefetch probably > isn't going to get it in time. I think that's OK though. Once the > background process is started, response times will be quicker... > although possibly still not quick enough. We'd need to benchmark this > to determine how quickly the background process can actually service > requests. Does anybody have a good self-contained test case that > showcases the benefits of prefetching? > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU=1znt5qahwujgpw9xqm0ggpeb4lc2etqxccs8bjct8j...@mail.gmail.com Cheers, Jeff
