On 12/11/2013 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> And, for that matter, accepting this patch by no means blocks doing >> something more sophisticated in the future. > > Yeah. I think the only real argument against it is "do we really need > yet another knob?". Since Josh, who's usually the voicer of that > argument, is for this one, I don't have a problem with it.
This passes the "is it a chronic problem not to have a knob for this?" test. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
