Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch that implements this, makes some of the
>> documentation improvements that you suggested, and rebases everything.
> I'm still kinda unimpressed by this. Behavior-changing GUC, uggh.
We should have learned by now that those are usually a bad idea.
In this case, we've got changes in the behavior of function calling,
which seems like not only a nightmare for debugging but a fertile
source of security issues.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
