On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: >> Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: >> > I don't see why we are trying to accommodate a case where the author >> > doesn't offer enough full SQL scripts and offers broken downgrade >> > scripts; or why that case is different from offering broken upgrade >> > scripts. >> >> That's fair enough I guess. I will work on automating the choice of the >> first full script to use then, for next patch version. > > Can we separate this feature out? It's an issue with extensions today, > and I'm eager to make some progress after the explosion of differing > opinions today.
+1 for separating that part out. I thought it was separated, at some point. > Robert, do you think this is an acceptable approach to solve your pet > peeve here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA > +tgmoae3qs4qbqfxouzzfxrsxa0zy8ibsoysuutzdumpea...@mail.gmail.com I'd need to look exactly what's being proposed in more detail. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
