Sent from my iPad
> On 28-Nov-2013, at 16:13, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> I'm not real sure what this'd buy us that wouldn't be done as well or >> better by creating a view on the remote side. (IOW, there's nothing >> that says that the remote object backing a foreign table can't be a >> view.) > > Agreed, for those remote sides that know what a view is. I agree. I agree with the overall model here, but I am not sure how it would work out for non SQL supporting remote sides. Regards, Atri -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
