On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:18:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I had a thought about what to do with the ECPG grammar-too-big problem: > rather than depending on a beta release of bison, we could attack the > problem directly by omitting some of the backend grammar from what ECPG > supports. Surely there are not many people using ECPG to issue obscure > utility commands like, for example, DROP OPERATOR CLASS.
But then there may be one. And I'd prefer to not remove features that used to exist. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
