On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:43:34PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-11-21 14:40:36 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > > But if the transaction would not have otherwise generated WAL (i.e. a > > select that did not have to do any HOT pruning, or an update with zero rows > > matching the where condition), doesn't it now have to flush and wait when > > it would otherwise not? > > We short circuit that if there's no xid assigned. Check > RecordTransactionCommit().
OK, that was my question, now answered. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
