On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/11/22 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what >>>> data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined rows. >> >>> By 'insignificant' you mean 'necessary to do any non-trivial real >>> work'. Personally, I'd prefer it if FDW was extended to allow >>> arbitrary parameterized queries like every other database connectivity >>> API ever made ever. >> >> [ shrug... ] So use dblink. For better or worse, the FDW stuff is >> following the SQL standard's SQL/MED design, which does not do it >> like that. > > Pass-through mode mentioned in SQL/MED standard might be what he wants.
happen to have a link handy? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
