On 2013-11-19 10:37:35 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > The only animal we have that doesn't support quiet inlines today is > > HP-UX/ac++, and I think - as in patch 1 in the series - we might be able > > to simply suppress the warning there. > > Or just not worry about it, if it's only a warning? Or does the warning > mean code bloat (lots of useless copies of the inline function)?
I honestly have no idea whether it causes code bloat - I'd be surprised if it did since it detects that they are unused, but I cannot rule it out entirely. The suggested patch - untested since I have no access to HP-UX - just adds +W2177 to the compiler's commandline in template/hpux which supposedly suppressed that warning. I think removing the quiet inline test is a good idea, but that doesn't preclude fixing the warnings at the same time. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
