2013/11/12 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: >> 2013/11/12 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> There's no possible way you'll finish this for 9.4. > >> Yes, I understand it is not possible to submit whole of the patch until >> CF3 deadline. So, I'd like to find out a way to implement it as an >> extension using facilities being supported or to be enhanced on v9.4. > > Oh! Okay, I misunderstood the context --- you meant this as an example > use-case for the custom plan feature, right? Makes more sense now. > > I'm still dubious that it'd actually be very useful in itself, but it > seems reasonable as a test case to make sure that a set of hooks for > custom plans are sufficient to do something useful with. > Yes. I intend to put most of this table-caching feature on the custom-scan APIs set, even though it may take additional hooks due to its nature, independent from planner and executor structure.
So, are you thinking it is a feasible approach to focus on custom-scan APIs during the upcoming CF3, then table-caching feature as use-case of this APIs on CF4? Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
