Andres, > I find it utterly ridiculous to accuse the people that *do* reviews of > not doing anything. By doing code-level reviews reviewers teach authors > and bystanders more about the code. Which actually can increase the > number of review(ers) and even committers in the long run.
It would be nice if it worked that way -- in a review system which wasn't broken, it *should* work that way -- but a quick look at who's been doing the reviews for the last 2 releases shows that we no longer get new reviewers. Don't get me wrong. *you* are doing a ton of reviews, and if we had 20 people like you, then we wouldn't be talking about the review process at all because everything would be done already. But we don't. And, for that matter, I personally would love to see you not *need* to do so many reviews, so that you could spend more time working on LSR. > And no, not having an own solution, doesn't turn somebody elses > non-solution into a solution. Either you're proposing a solution, supporting someone else's solution, or you're saying the problem isn't important. There is no fourth alternative. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
