On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:27 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Hi Fujii-san, > > > (2013/09/30 12:49), Fujii Masao wrote: >> On second thought, the patch could compress WAL very much because I used >> pgbench. >> >> I will do the same measurement by using another benchmark. > > If you hope, I can test this patch in DBT-2 benchmark in end of this week. > I will use under following test server. > > * Test server > Server: HP Proliant DL360 G7 > CPU: Xeon E5640 2.66GHz (1P/4C) > Memory: 18GB(PC3-10600R-9) > Disk: 146GB(15k)*4 RAID1+0 > RAID controller: P410i/256MB
Yep, please! It's really helpful! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
