On 9/23/13 12:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have: > * pg_receivexlog > * pg_recvlogical > binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and > once "pg_receive"?
It's consistent because they are the same length! (Obviously, this would severely restrict future tool naming.) In all seriousness, I like this naming best so far. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
